Crow v. McElroy Coal Co
This text of Crow v. McElroy Coal Co (Crow v. McElroy Coal Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1913
KENNETH LEE CROW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MCELROY COAL COMPANY, a division of Consol Energy Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-52-5)
Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 7, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Lee Crow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Lee Crow appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss Crow’s
employment discrimination complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Crow v. McElroy Coal Co., No. CA-02-52-5
(N.D.W. Va. June 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crow v. McElroy Coal Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crow-v-mcelroy-coal-co-ca4-2003.