Crow v. Erie Railroad

190 N.W. 339, 153 Minn. 553, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 856
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 28, 1922
DocketNo. 23,260
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 N.W. 339 (Crow v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crow v. Erie Railroad, 190 N.W. 339, 153 Minn. 553, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 856 (Mich. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the service of the summons in this action is granted. The case is controlled by the decision in Callaghan v. Union Pac. R. Co. 148 Minn. 482, 182 N. W. 1004. Defendant is not thereby deprived of a right to review the order. It may be assigned as error on an appeal from the judgment, if one can be recovered against defendant, with the same force and effect as on an appeal from the order. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. § 389.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nielsen v. Braland
119 N.W.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.W. 339, 153 Minn. 553, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crow-v-erie-railroad-minn-1922.