Crow v. Erie Railroad
190 N.W. 339, 153 Minn. 553, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 856
Opinion
The motion to dismiss the appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the service of the summons in this action is granted. The case is controlled by the decision in Callaghan v. Union Pac. R. Co. 148 Minn. 482, 182 N. W. 1004. Defendant is not thereby deprived of a right to review the order. It may be assigned as error on an appeal from the judgment, if one can be recovered against defendant, with the same force and effect as on an appeal from the order. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. § 389.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crow v. Erie Railroad, 190 N.W. 339, 153 Minn. 553, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 856 (Mich. 1922).
190 N.W. 339 (Crow v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nielsen v. Braland
119 N.W.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1963)