Crouse v. H. O. Clark Furniture, Inc.
This text of 323 So. 2d 34 (Crouse v. H. O. Clark Furniture, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant-plaintiff seeks review of an order vacating and setting aside a jury verdict awarding punitive damages on the ground that appellant did not present any evidence of the appellee-defendants’ financial ability to pay an award of punitive damages.
Upon consideration of the record, brief and oral argument of counsel for appellant, no appearance having been made by the appellee, we determine evidence of financial worth is not a requisite to award punitive damages, and it was error for the trial court to so require.1 Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So.2d 762 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded to reinstate the jury verdict for punitive damages and for entry of an amended final judgment awarding punitive damages.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 So. 2d 34, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crouse-v-h-o-clark-furniture-inc-fladistctapp-1975.