Crouse v. H. O. Clark Furniture, Inc.

323 So. 2d 34, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18879
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1975·No. No. 74-1196·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff seeks review of an order vacating and setting aside a jury verdict awarding punitive damages on the ground that appellant did not present any evidence of the appellee-defendants’ financial ability to pay an award of punitive damages.

Upon consideration of the record, brief and oral argument of counsel for appellant, no appearance having been made by the appellee, we determine evidence of financial worth is not a requisite to award punitive damages, and it was error for the trial court to so require.1 Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So.2d 762 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded to reinstate the jury verdict for punitive damages and for entry of an amended final judgment awarding punitive damages.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur. DOWNEY, J., specially concurs with opinion.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crouse v. H. O. Clark Furniture, Inc., 323 So. 2d 34, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18879 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

323 So. 2d 34 (Crouse v. H. O. Clark Furniture, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rinaldi v. Aaron
314 So. 2d 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Lassitter v. Walton
314 So. 2d 761 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
International Union of Operating Engineers v. Lassitter
295 So. 2d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)