Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Crouse v. Amsterdam Industrial Development Agency

Crouse v. Amsterdam Industrial Development Agency

91 A.D.2d 1142, 458 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16482
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1142 (Crouse v. Amsterdam Industrial Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crouse v. Amsterdam Industrial Development Agency, 91 A.D.2d 1142, 458 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Graves, J.), entered July 6, 1982 in Montgomery County, which granted fourth-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed fourth-party defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., to defend and insure fourth-party plaintiff in the third-party action. Order affirmed, with costs {Insurance Co. of North Amer. v Dayton Tool & Die Works, 57 NY2d 489). Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurance Co. of North America v. Dayton Tool & Die Works, Inc.
443 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 1142, 458 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crouse-v-amsterdam-industrial-development-agency-nyappdiv-1983.