Crouch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Crouch v. State

225 S.W.2d 831

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 15, 1949

DocketNo. 24422

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.W.2d 831 (Crouch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crouch v. State, 225 S.W.2d 831 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the Pure Food Law, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 706 et seq.; the punishment assessed, a fine of $150.

The case of Neill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 829, is, in all legal aspects, the same as that here presented. '

The opinion in that case is here applicable, and reference is made thereto.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the Pure Food Law, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 706 et seq.; the punishment assessed, a fine of $150.

The case of Neill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 829, is, in all legal aspects, the same as that here presented. '

The opinion in that case is here applicable, and reference is made thereto.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.W.2d 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crouch-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack