Crouch v. State

225 S.W.2d 831, 154 Tex. Crim. 156, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1370

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 15, 1949·No. 24421·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the Pure Food Law; the punishment assessed, a fine of $150.

The case of Neill v. State, No. 24,423, (Page ______ of this-volume) this day decided, is, in all legal aspects, the same as that here presented.

The opinion in that case is here applicable, and reference is made thereto.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the Pure Food Law; the punishment assessed, a fine of $150.

The case of Neill v. State, No. 24,423, (Page ______ of this-volume) this day decided, is, in all legal aspects, the same as that here presented.

The opinion in that case is here applicable, and reference is made thereto.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Crouch v. State, 225 S.W.2d 831, 154 Tex. Crim. 156, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1370 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

225 S.W.2d 831 (Crouch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.