Crouch v. Miro

Supreme Court of Florida

Crouch v. Miro

158 So. 130, 117 Fla. 631, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1317

DecidedDecember 13, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 130 (Crouch v. Miro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crouch v. Miro, 158 So. 130, 117 Fla. 631, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1317 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from final decree in -a mortgage foreclosure suit in which the defendant interposed the defense of usury.

The defense was sustained by the terms of the final decree and deductions made accordingly.

The assignments of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree. There is substantial evidence to; support the decree and, therefore, the same will not be disturbed by the appellate court.

Decree affirmed.

So ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI