Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

75 A.D.2d 619, 427 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.D.2d 619 (Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 75 A.D.2d 619, 427 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the respondent which, after a hearing, (1) suspended the restaurant liquor license of petitioner Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc., for 10 days and (2) sent a letter of warning to petitioner Cortlandt Colonial Restaurant, Inc. Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The authority’s determinations that petitioners were guilty of the charges are supported by substantial evidence. The penalties imposed by the authority are not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the respondent which, after a hearing, (1) suspended the restaurant liquor license of petitioner Croton Colonial Restaurant & Diner, Inc., for 10 days and (2) sent a letter of warning to petitioner Cortlandt Colonial Restaurant, Inc. Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The authority’s determinations that petitioners were guilty of the charges are supported by substantial evidence. The penalties imposed by the authority are not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 619, 427 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croton-colonial-restaurant-diner-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1980.