Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.
307 P.2d 881, 49 Wash. 2d 876, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 Wash. 2d 684 →
Opinion
One of the judges of this court being incapacitated and absent on account of illness, this case was argued to the remaining eight judges sitting En Banc. These eight judges are divided in their opinions, and there is no majority either for affirmance or for reversal.
Therefore the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.
April 19, 1957. Petition for rehearing granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc., 307 P.2d 881, 49 Wash. 2d 876, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 464 (Wash. 1957).
307 P.2d 881 (Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.