Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 6316
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 2013·No. 09-12-00563-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-12-00563-CV

CROSSTEX NGL PIPELINE, L.P., Appellant V.

REINS ROAD FARMS-1, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 60th District Court Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-192,430

MEMORANDUM TO CLERK

You are directed to make the following correction in the Opinion dated May 23, 2013:

On page 5, the first full paragraph, the first sentence that reads, “First, we evaluate Crosstex’s claim that the evidence established that pipeline is a crude petroleum line.” should be changed to read, “First, we evaluate Crosstex’s claim that the evidence established that its pipeline is a crude petroleum line.”

You will give notice of this correction in the original Opinion by sending a copy of the corrected page accompanied by this memorandum to all interested parties who received a copy of the original Opinion.

Entered this the 14th day of October, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd. (Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.