Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.

690 F. App'x 665
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 2017
Docket2016-1930; 2016-1931
StatusPublished

This text of 690 F. App'x 665 (Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., 690 F. App'x 665 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Reyna, Circuit Judge.

Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) inter partes review (“IPR”) decisions finding claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 14-39 of U.S. Patent No. 7,051,147 (“147 patent”) unpatentable as obvious.

Our decision today in Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Cis-co Systems, Inc. et al., Nos. 2016-2017, -2026, and -2027, addresses. largely the same arguments and finds [666]*666the same claims of the ’147 patent to be unpatentable. For the reasons articulated in that decision, here too we affirm.

These two appeals further argue that the PTAB erred in finding certain claims obvious over a combination of U.S. Patent No, 6,219,771 (“Kikuchi”) and other references. This is an independent ground of obviousness. Because we have already-found these claims obvious based on other references, we need not reach these arguments.

AFFIRMED

Costs

Each party to bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 F. App'x 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossroads-systems-inc-v-oracle-corp-cafc-2017.