Crossroads at Cheshire v. Cheshire Planning, No. 29 76 67 (Nov. 9, 1990)
This text of 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 3642 (Crossroads at Cheshire v. Cheshire Planning, No. 29 76 67 (Nov. 9, 1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals from zoning commission and planning and zoning commissions may be taken to the Superior Court. . .in the manner provided in
At the hearing on aggrievement, Crossroads submitted certified copies of two warranty deeds as evidence of its ownership of property within the Interchange Zone ["IC Zone"]. The Commission argues that "merely because Plaintiff owns property within the IC Zone, Plaintiff is not statutorily aggrieved by that decision because the zone text amendment affects no particular `portion of land.'"
An owner of land which is the subject of decision by the local zoning authority is aggrieved. Bossert Corp. v. Norwalk,
Accordingly within the IC Zone, Crossroads is aggrieved and entitled to maintain this appeal.
Donald W. Celotto, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 3642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossroads-at-cheshire-v-cheshire-planning-no-29-76-67-nov-9-1990-connsuperct-1990.