Crosson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided July 2, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00011·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kimberly Crosson v. Case No. 25-cv-11-SE-TSM Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director, et al

ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated April 30, 2025. For the reasons explained therein, Crosson’s requests to change venue and for recusal (Doc. No 5) are denied; her request for records (Doc. No. 5) is denied without prejudice; her motion for exclusion and exemption of mailings and filing (Doc. No. 5) is denied as moot; and her motion to amend is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. SDlietl> Samantha D. Elliott = United States District Judge Date: July 2, 2025 cc: Kimberly Crosson, pro se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director, (D.N.H. 2025).

Crosson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director (Crosson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related