Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.

Fifth Circuit

Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.

346 F.2d 152

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 1965

DocketNo. 21999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 346 F.2d 152 (Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., 346 F.2d 152 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. The cross-appéllant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.

As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. The cross-appéllant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.

As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 F.2d 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossman-v-fontainebleau-hotel-corp-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack