Crossman Co. v. Rauch
248 A.D. 885, 291 N.Y.S. 161, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crossman Co. v. Rauch. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 758 →
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crossman Co. v. Rauch, 248 A.D. 885, 291 N.Y.S. 161, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 885 (Crossman Co. v. Rauch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.