Crossley v. State

120 S.E. 39, 31 Ga. App. 120, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 770
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1923
Docket14952
StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 39 (Crossley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crossley v. State, 120 S.E. 39, 31 Ga. App. 120, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 770 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial containing the usual general grounds only, and there being some evidence authorizing the verdict, the overruling of the motion was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E. 39, 31 Ga. App. 120, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossley-v-state-gactapp-1923.