Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery

148 So. 418, 226 Ala. 679, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 452
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 25, 1933
Docket3 Div. 56.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 So. 418 (Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery, 148 So. 418, 226 Ala. 679, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 452 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

This is an appeal under section 6003 of the Code of 1923, from a decree of the probate court dismissing the report of the executor that the estate is insolvent, made and filed as required by section 5995 of the Code, on an issue of the correctness of the report made by a creditor, First National Bank of Montgomery, and R. T. Rives, as the guardian ad litem for the minor heirs.

The issue was of fact, and the appeal is on the record without a bill of exceptions.

The decree, the basis of the appeal, recites: “After hearing the evidence the Court being of the opinion that the realty owned by said decedent at the time of her death was of the value of $3,000 and more.” (Italics supplied.) In the absence of a bill of exceptions presenting a statement of the evidence, we are not in a position to review this conclusion.

There is nothing in the decree dismissing said report of insolvency that precludes the minor heirs, through their guardian or next friend from asserting and claiming their exemptions, or that denies to the probate court the power, or relieves the court of the duty, of causing such exemptions to be • set apart. Code 1923, §§ 7918-7926.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery
172 So. 255 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 So. 418, 226 Ala. 679, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossland-v-first-nat-bank-of-montgomery-ala-1933.