Crossey, M., Pets v. Boockvar, Bur of Elect
This text of Crossey, M., Pets v. Boockvar, Bur of Elect (Crossey, M., Pets v. Boockvar, Bur of Elect) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[J-97-2020] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MICHAEL CROSSEY, DWAYNE THOMAS, : No. 108 MM 2020 IRVIN WEINREICH, BRENDA WEINREICH, : AND THE PENNSYLVANIA ALLIANCE : FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, : : Petitioners : SUBMITTED: September 8, 2020 : : v. : : : KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF : THE COMMONWEALTH, AND JESSICA : MATHIS, DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, : : Respondents :
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT
CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: September 17, 2020
I would not dismiss the Petitioner’s request for extension of the deadline for receipt
of mail-in ballots as moot. Instead, I would have employed this case as the vehicle to
decide that issue on the evidentiary record developed before President Judge Leavitt in
accordance with this Court’s assignment, and I would have resolved the matter based on
the rationale set forth by Justice Donohue in her concurring and dissenting opinion in
Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 133 MM 2020.
In all other respects, I join the per curiam Order.
Justices Donohue and Mundy join this concurring and dissenting statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crossey, M., Pets v. Boockvar, Bur of Elect, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossey-m-pets-v-boockvar-bur-of-elect-pa-2020.