Cross v. Wilson

52 Ark. 312
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Warning Order. The record of the cause in which the decree relied upon as the foundation of the appellant’s title, was rendered, shows that it was based upon a warning order which does not state material facts required by the statute, and that proof of its publication is fatally defective. The decree was therefore void. Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross v. Wilson, 52 Ark. 312 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 312 (Cross v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Little Rock v. Rose
206 S.W. 449 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Reeves v. Conger
147 S.W. 438 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Brinkley
164 F. 963 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
Johnson v. Hunter
147 F. 133 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
Clay v. Bilby
78 S.W. 749 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Gallagher v. Johnson
44 S.W. 1041 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1898)
Hot Springs v. Curry
41 S.W. 55 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1897)