Cross v. Town of Harmony

257 A.D. 1029, 13 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8955
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find a fan question of fact was presented by the evidence as to the negligence of the defendant and the freedom of the plaintiff from contributory negligence, and that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence. Costs are not awarded as the plaintiff has been granted an order to sue as a poor person. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial, and Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of being struck by an overhanging limb of a tree.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross v. Town of Harmony, 257 A.D. 1029, 13 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 1029 (Cross v. Town of Harmony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State of New York Department of Correctional Services
242 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez
70 Misc. 2d 16 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)