Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.

160 A.2d 847, 32 N.J. 350

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

32 N.J. 350 (1960) 160 A.2d 847

HOWART CROSS, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT E. LAMB, INC., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER, AND TRUSKEY INDUSTRIAL PIPE FITTERS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 4, 1960.

Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille for the plaintiff-petitioner.

Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos for the defendant-petitioner.

Messrs. Kisselman, Devine & Deighan for the defendant-respondent.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

32 N.J. 350 (1960) 160 A.2d 847

HOWART CROSS, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT E. LAMB, INC., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER, AND TRUSKEY INDUSTRIAL PIPE FITTERS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 4, 1960.

Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille for the plaintiff-petitioner.

Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos for the defendant-petitioner.

Messrs. Kisselman, Devine & Deighan for the defendant-respondent.

Denied.

Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc., 160 A.2d 847, 32 N.J. 350 (N.J. 1960).

Pincite

160 A.2d 847 (Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swank v. Halivopoulos

260 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)