Cross v. Prohaska

170 N.W. 665, 103 Neb. 146, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 15
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 1, 1919
DocketNo. 20336
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 N.W. 665 (Cross v. Prohaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cross v. Prohaska, 170 N.W. 665, 103 Neb. 146, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 15 (Neb. 1919).

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is an action to recover a commission of $500 for the sale of land. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff has appealed.

The assignments of error are based on misconduct of a witness and of the jury. The evidence has not been preserved by a bill of exceptions, and without the evidence the merits of the assignments cannot be determined. What purports to be a bill of exceptions was filed in this court, but it was not allowed as [147]*147such by the trial judge or authenticated by the clerk of the district court. It must therefore he disregarded on appeal. Dugger v. Smith, 94 Neb. 552; Gay v. Reynolds, 57 Neb. 194.

Apeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bednar v. Bednar
21 N.W.2d 438 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 N.W. 665, 103 Neb. 146, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-prohaska-neb-1919.