Cross v. Prohaska
This text of 170 N.W. 665 (Cross v. Prohaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to recover a commission of $500 for the sale of land. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff has appealed.
The assignments of error are based on misconduct of a witness and of the jury. The evidence has not been preserved by a bill of exceptions, and without the evidence the merits of the assignments cannot be determined. What purports to be a bill of exceptions was filed in this court, but it was not allowed as [147]*147such by the trial judge or authenticated by the clerk of the district court. It must therefore he disregarded on appeal. Dugger v. Smith, 94 Neb. 552; Gay v. Reynolds, 57 Neb. 194.
Apeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 N.W. 665, 103 Neb. 146, 1919 Neb. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-prohaska-neb-1919.