Cross v. Opm

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: June 13, 2014
• Docket: 14-3119
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 14-3119 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REBECCA M. CROSS, Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. ______________________

2014-3119 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH-0831-12-0766-I-2. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER Upon review of this recently docketed petition for re- view, it appears that Rebecca M. Cross’s petition was not timely filed. On February 19, 2014, the Merit Systems Protection Board denied Cross’s petition for review of an initial decision that determined that the Office of Personnel Management properly calculated her creditable service Case: 14-3119 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2014

toward a retirement annuity. The court received her petition for review on April 22, 2014, which was 61 days after the Board issued its final order. The time for filing a petition for review from a Board decision or order is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that “[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A). This filing period is “statutory, mandato- ry, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Cross is directed to show cause, within 21 days of the date of filing of this order, why this petition should not be dismissed as untimely. The Office of Personnel Management may also respond within that time. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s26