Cross v. Moog

155 So. 302, 1934 La. App. LEXIS 772
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 11, 1934·No. No. 14892.·Published

Opinion

JANVIER, Judge.

Joseph Cross rented a three-room apartment from Joseph Moog. Cross’ son, fourteen years old, was injured when plaster fell from the ceiling of one of the rooms, striking him on the head and shoulder. The boy was taken to -the Charity Hospital where he received first aid treatment. He returned to his home the next day. Cross brings this suit against Moog claiming on his own behalf $18 *303 as the amount of the doctor’s hill which he will be required to pay, and claiming on behalf of his minor son $282 to compensate him for his suffering.

In the court helow there was judgment in favor of plaintiff on his own behalf for $18 and for the use and benefit of his son for $82. Defendant has appealed, and plaintiff has answered the appeal asking that the amount awarded for the use of his son be increased.

There is no controversy over the question of liability.

While it appears that the injuries to the boy were not at all serious, nevertheless, he was confined to his bed for a short period and we cannot say that the amount awarded him, $82, is excessive. On the other hand the judge of the trial court saw the boy and heard the witnesses, and we therefore feel that his estimate as to the damage sustained cannot be said to be manifestly inadequate.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross v. Moog, 155 So. 302, 1934 La. App. LEXIS 772 (La. Ct. App. 1934).

155 So. 302 (Cross v. Moog) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.