Cross v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Cross v. Maass

873 P.2d 436, 127 Or. App. 554, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 616

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 20, 1994

Docket89C-12095; CA A79509

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 873 P.2d 436 (Cross v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cross v. Maass, 873 P.2d 436, 127 Or. App. 554, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 616 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.650. He seeks a delayed appeal, because the counsel appointed to file a notice of appeal from his convictions failed to do so and he was denied constitutionally adequate assistance of counsel. The state concedes that petitioner is entitled to a delayed appeal. Clawson v. Maass, 119 Or App 287, 850 P2d 398 (1993). We accept that concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant delayed appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.650. He seeks a delayed appeal, because the counsel appointed to file a notice of appeal from his convictions failed to do so and he was denied constitutionally adequate assistance of counsel. The state concedes that petitioner is entitled to a delayed appeal. Clawson v. Maass, 119 Or App 287, 850 P2d 398 (1993). We accept that concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant delayed appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 P.2d 436, 127 Or. App. 554, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-maass-orctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack