Cross v. Hobson
2 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367
Opinion
The defendant can take nothing by his motion. In the cause of Caldwell v. Graham, decided in January term, 1803, we determined we would not help an insolvent who omitted to plead his discharge as he might have done.
Motion denied.
See case of Shaw v. Wilmerden, 2 Cai. R. 38; Van Valkenbergh v. Dederick, 1 J. C 133; see Billings v. Skutt, 1 J. C. 105.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cross v. Hobson, 2 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
2 Cai. Cas. 102 (Cross v. Hobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rudge v. Rundle
1 Thomp. & Cook 649 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Monroe v. . Upton
50 N.Y. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Dresser v. Brooks
3 Barb. 429 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Palmer v. Hutchins
1 Cow. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)