Cross v. Hobson
2 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 102 (Cross v. Hobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cross v. Hobson, 2 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
The defendant can take nothing by his motion. In the cause of Caldwell v. Graham, decided in January term, 1803, we determined we would not help an insolvent who omitted to plead his discharge as he might have done.
Motion denied.
See case of Shaw v. Wilmerden, 2 Cai. R. 38; Van Valkenbergh v. Dederick, 1 J. C 133; see Billings v. Skutt, 1 J. C. 105.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rudge v. Rundle
1 Thomp. & Cook 649 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Monroe v. . Upton
50 N.Y. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Dresser v. Brooks
3 Barb. 429 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Palmer v. Hutchins
1 Cow. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-hobson-nysupct-1804.