Cross v. Dye
This text of 102 A. 816 (Cross v. Dye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed on the following from the charge of the court in directing a verdict for the defendant: “In the opinion of the court the will in question created 'in Marietta R. Cross, daughter of Harriet R. Cross, the testatrix, an estate tail which estate, under the Act of Assembly in this State passed in 1855, [209]*209became a fee simple estate in Marietta E. Cross, and as we view it by her deeds there finally became vested in A. J. Dye, the defendant in this case, a fee simple to the property in question.”
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 A. 816, 259 Pa. 207, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-dye-pa-1917.