Cross v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cross v. Division of Employment Security

364 S.W.3d 263, 2012 WL 1243077, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 469

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 2012

DocketED 96933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 364 S.W.3d 263 (Cross v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cross v. Division of Employment Security, 364 S.W.3d 263, 2012 WL 1243077, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Cross (Claimant) appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Appeals Tribunal’s decision that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he voluntarily quit his employment is final and not subject to our review here because Claimant’s appeal before the Commission was previously filed out of time; and this Court will not review Claimant’s voluntary quit determination in a subsequent determination regarding an unemployment benefit overpayment. See Lockridge v. American Group, Inc., 193 S.W.3d 836, 838 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Cross (Claimant) appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Appeals Tribunal’s decision that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he voluntarily quit his employment is final and not subject to our review here because Claimant’s appeal before the Commission was previously filed out of time; and this Court will not review Claimant’s voluntary quit determination in a subsequent determination regarding an unemployment benefit overpayment. See Lockridge v. American Group, Inc., 193 S.W.3d 836, 838 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 S.W.3d 263, 2012 WL 1243077, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack