Cross v. Cutter Biological

685 So. 2d 142

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 10, 1997·No. 96-C-2220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

685 So.2d 142 (1997)

Gary W. CROSS, Individually and on Behalf of the Minor Son, Darren Bradley Cross and Karen Cross
v.
CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, A DIVISION OF MILES, INC., Armour Pharmaceutical Company, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Tulane University School of Medicine, et al.

No. 96-C-2220.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 10, 1997.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

685 So.2d 142 (1997)

Gary W. CROSS, Individually and on Behalf of the Minor Son, Darren Bradley Cross and Karen Cross
v.
CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, A DIVISION OF MILES, INC., Armour Pharmaceutical Company, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Tulane University School of Medicine, et al.

No. 96-C-2220.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 10, 1997.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.

Cross v. Cutter Biological, 685 So. 2d 142 (La. 1997).

Pincite

685 So. 2d 142 (Cross v. Cutter Biological) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Cutter Biological

770 So. 2d 392 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)