Cross v. Cruz

Fourth Circuit

Cross v. Cruz

594 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 14-7488·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cross, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cross v. Cruz, No. 1:14-cv-00089-TLW (D.S.C. July 2, 2014; Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cross, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cross v. Cruz, No. 1:14-cv-00089-TLW (D.S.C. July 2, 2014; Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cross v. Cruz, 594 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

594 F. App'x 200 (Cross v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related