Cross v. Cross
222 A.D. 791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the question of the competency of the witness Mary Rudes under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act was not sufficiently raised, and the evidence supports the findings. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cross v. Cross, 222 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
222 A.D. 791 (Cross v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Levine
247 A.D. 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)