Cross v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cross v. City of New York

123 A.D. 917, 107 N.Y.S. 942

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1908·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment must be modified by increasing the amount for which judgment was rendered, by the salary attached to the position of inspector of police from Hovember 11, 1904, the daté of the order by which plaintiff was reinstated, to December 22, 1904, the date on which he resumed his duties as inspector (McVeany v. Mayor, 80 N. Y. 185), and as so modified it will be affirmed, without costs. (Grant v. City of New York, 111 App. Div. 160.) Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment- modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment must be modified by increasing the amount for which judgment was rendered, by the salary attached to the position of inspector of police from Hovember 11, 1904, the daté of the order by which plaintiff was reinstated, to December 22, 1904, the date on which he resumed his duties as inspector (McVeany v. Mayor, 80 N. Y. 185), and as so modified it will be affirmed, without costs. (Grant v. City of New York, 111 App. Div. 160.) Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment- modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Cross v. City of New York, 123 A.D. 917, 107 N.Y.S. 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

123 A.D. 917 (Cross v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related