Cross v. City of New York

123 A.D. 917, 107 N.Y.S. 942

This text of 123 A.D. 917 (Cross v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cross v. City of New York, 123 A.D. 917, 107 N.Y.S. 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment must be modified by increasing the amount for which judgment was rendered, by the salary attached to the position of inspector of police from Hovember 11, 1904, the daté of the order by which plaintiff was reinstated, to December 22, 1904, the date on which he resumed his duties as inspector (McVeany v. Mayor, 80 N. Y. 185), and as so modified it will be affirmed, without costs. (Grant v. City of New York, 111 App. Div. 160.) Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment- modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McVeany v. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty
80 N.Y. 185 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Grant v. City of New York
111 A.D. 160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D. 917, 107 N.Y.S. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1908.