Cross v. City of Chicago

198 Ill. App. 177
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 2, 1916
DocketGen. No. 20,638
StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 177 (Cross v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cross v. City of Chicago, 198 Ill. App. 177 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 1802*—when Appellate Court will reverse ancl remand case because of subsequent decision of Supreme Court on similar point. Where Supreme Court holds point of law contrary to holding of Appellate Court in different case but in same term of court, the Appellate Court will reverse and remand such case which it had previously affirmed. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13*—when statement of claim in action against city for personal injuries sufficient. In fourth-class cases in the Municipal Court of Chicago, a statement of claim in an action against a city for personal injuries need not allege the giving of statutory notice of injuries to the city.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 Ill. App. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-city-of-chicago-illappct-1916.