Cross v. California
528 U.S. 801, 120 S. Ct. 309
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 1999
DocketNo. 98-9308; No. 98-9504
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 528 U.S. 801 (Cross v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cross v. California, 528 U.S. 801, 120 S. Ct. 309 (1999).
Opinion
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist.; and
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and eases remanded for further consideration in light of Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019
Hanover Ins. Co. v. Riceland Aviation, Inc.
269 So. 3d 911 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
Hanover Insurance Company v. Riceland Aviation, Inc. Consolidated With United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Global Tower, LLC.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019
Chelsea MacE v. Sherman Turner
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018
State v. Eaglin
239 So. 3d 1001 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State of Louisiana v. Kyvonte Latrell Eaglin
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018
Godchaux v. Peerless Insurance Co.
140 So. 3d 817 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)
United States v. D'Amico
734 F. Supp. 2d 321 (S.D. New York, 2010)
United States v. Payne
591 F.3d 46 (Second Circuit, 2010)
State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.
944 A.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
State v. Ortiz
922 A.2d 244 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
State v. Peeler
841 A.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
United States v. Johnson
270 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (N.D. Iowa, 2003)
United States v. Collins
240 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (D. South Dakota, 2002)
United States v. Huerta
247 F. Supp. 2d 902 (S.D. Ohio, 2002)
United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon
248 F.3d 1036 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Dickerson
Eleventh Circuit, 2001
State v. Arnold
779 So. 2d 840 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Hahnaman Albrecht v. Potash Corporation
Eighth Circuit, 2000
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
203 F.3d 1028 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
528 U.S. 801, 120 S. Ct. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-california-scotus-1999.