Cross v. California Department of Food and Agriculture

E.D. California

Cross v. California Department of Food and Agriculture

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 26, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-01302·Unknown

Opinion

NICKIE CROSS, Case No. 1:18-CV-01302-DAD-JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION v. (Doc. 44) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD

Defendants. The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own costs and fees. (Doc. 44) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NICKIE CROSS, Case No. 1:18-CV-01302-DAD-JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION v. (Doc. 44) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD

Defendants. The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own costs and fees. (Doc. 44) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cross v. California Department of Food and Agriculture, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Cross v. California Department of Food and Agriculture (Cross v. California Department of Food and Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related