Cross v. Bouvier
This text of Cross v. Bouvier (Cross v. Bouvier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT YORK, SS. Civil Action Docket No. AP-14-036
NICKY LEE M. CROSS,
Plaintiff/ Appellee,
v. ORDER
HEATHER BOYCE BOUVIER,
Defendant/ Appellant.
Nicky Lee M. Cross brought a small claims action against Heather B. Bouvier to
recover monies that she claimed she had loaned Ms. Bouvier and that Ms. Bouvier
failed to repay . A final hearing was held in Biddeford District Court on November 4,
2014, after which the court (Janelle, J.) issued a judgment in Ms. Cross's favor in the
amount of $736.00 plus $99.99 in costs. Ms. Bouvier filed a timely appeal to this court.
Her appeal essentially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.
The notice does not request a jury trial de novo. Thus, the court's review of
the District Court's decision is limited to questions of law only. See M .R.S.C.P. ll(d)(2).
Moreover, "[a]ny findings of fact of the District Court shall not be set aside unless
clearly erroneous." M.R. Civ. P. 76D.
To determine whether or not the District Court judge acted within his discretion
and the judgment is supported by the law, the person appealing the decision is required
to produce either a transcript of the proceeding, or, if no electronic recording was made,
a statement of the evidence and proceeding settled and approved by the judge who
heard the trial. M.R. Civ.P. 76F(a), (c). In this case, the notice of appeal indicates that
"[n]o electronic or other recording of the proceedings being available, a statement in
1 lieu of transcript will be prepared." However, a statement in lieu of a transcript in
accordance with Rule 76F(c) has not been prepared and filed. This court has no basis,
therefore, for reviewing the judgment of the District Court. Manzo v. Reynolds, 477
A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984).
Accordingly, the entry shall be:
Appeal is DENIED. Judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
The clerk may incorporate this order upon the docket by reference pursuant to
Rule 79(a) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
DATE: March 3, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cross v. Bouvier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-bouvier-mesuperct-2016.