Cross v. Blanford

6 F. Cas. 887, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677

This text of 6 F. Cas. 887 (Cross v. Blanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cross v. Blanford, 6 F. Cas. 887, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677 (circtddc 1826).

Opinion

The Court

(Moesell, J., absent,)

was of opinion that, although the verdict of the jury was conclusive as to the facts of the case, yet this Court had a right to look into the facts upon a question of jurisdiction; and having done so, and being of opinion that the real ground of action, before the justice of the peace, was a tort, they reversed the judgment, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. Cas. 887, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-v-blanford-circtddc-1826.