Cross v. Bartholomew
42 Vt. 206
Opinion
[209]*209The opinion of the court was delivered by
We cannot reverse this judgment without overruling the decision in Lapham v. Kelley, 85 Yt., 195, on the very • point made by the exceptions in this case. That we are not disposed to do at present, and so the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cross v. Bartholomew, 42 Vt. 206 (Vt. 1869).
42 Vt. 206 (Cross v. Bartholomew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taplin & Rowell v. Clark
95 A. 491 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1915)
H. C. Jaquith Co. v. Shumway's Estate
69 A. 157 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1908)
Gleason & Field v. L. T. Kinney's Administrator
65 Vt. 560 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1893)
Barber's Adm'r v. Bennett
58 Vt. 476 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1886)
Quinn v. Halbert
52 Vt. 353 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1880)