Cross v. Bankruptcy Administrator

Fourth Circuit

Cross v. Bankruptcy Administrator

314 F. App'x 607

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2009·No. No. 08-2284·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Myrtle Cross appeals the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion to reopen a Chapter 11 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cross v. Bankruptcy Adm’r, No. 5:08-cv-258-BO, 2008 WL 4831438 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Myrtle Cross appeals the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion to reopen a Chapter 11 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cross v. Bankruptcy Adm’r, No. 5:08-cv-258-BO, 2008 WL 4831438 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cross v. Bankruptcy Administrator, 314 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

314 F. App'x 607 (Cross v. Bankruptcy Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.