Cross State Land Co. v. Pruett

278 F. 143, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1922
DocketNo. 3769
StatusPublished

This text of 278 F. 143 (Cross State Land Co. v. Pruett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cross State Land Co. v. Pruett, 278 F. 143, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1701 (5th Cir. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error sued defendant in error in an action at law, and there was judgment for the latter.

The judgment recites that the case was submitted to the court without a jury. The assignments of error complain only of findings of fact [144]*144upon which the judgment was based. No objection was taken to the sufficiency of the defense set out in the answer. It does not appear that the waiver of a'jury was by stipulation in writing.

The record presents no question for review by this court, for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of John McWilliams Ford v. William L. Grimmett, 278 Fed. 140, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Grimmett
278 F. 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 F. 143, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-state-land-co-v-pruett-ca5-1922.