Crosman v. City of Lynn
Opinion
The evidence would warrant the jury in finding that the maidservant, without any fault on her part, was prevented from returning from her mother’s house to her employer’s on Saturday night, and returned early on Sunday morning for the purpose of preparing needful food for her employer’s [303] family, which was a work of necessity, and justified her in travelling, and her employer or his manservant in driving her, on the Lord’s day. Gen. Sts. c. 84, § 1. Rex v. Cox, 2 Burr. 785. The King v. Younger, 5 T. R. 449. Commonwealth v. Sampson, 97 Mass. 407, 409. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
121 Mass. 301 (Crosman v. City of Lynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.