Crosley v. Banks
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #__ DATE FILED:_2/13/2024 CRYSAL CROSLEY, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Z.C., and CRYSAL CROSLEY, Individually, SVETLANA NISANOVA, as Parent and Natural Guardian of R.N., and SVETLANA NISANOVA, Individually, SVETLANA NISANOVA, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Y.N., and SVETLANA NISANOVA, Individually, 1:22-cv-7101 (MKV) Plaintiffs, ORDER OF DISMISSAL -against- DAVID C. BANKS, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, and THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendants informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 70]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by March 13, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
Date: February 13, 2024 MARY KAY VYSKOCI New York, NY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crosley v. Banks (Crosley v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.