Crosby v. State

1917 OK CR 147, 166 P. 445, 13 Okla. Crim. 662, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 153
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 21, 1917
DocketNo. A-2730.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1917 OK CR 147 (Crosby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crosby v. State, 1917 OK CR 147, 166 P. 445, 13 Okla. Crim. 662, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 153 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

MATSON, J.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted in the district court of Okmulgee county, charged by information with the crime of burglary in the second degree. He was-found guilty, and his punishment assessed by the jury at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of four years. From this judgment he has appealed.

No appearance was made by any one representing plaintiff in error as counsel when this case was called for oral argument; neither has any brief been filed directing the attention of the court to any supposed errors upon which the appeal was taken. This being an appeal from a conviction for a felony, we have taken the precaution to carefully examine the record, and we have discovered no errors which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the district court of Okmulgee county is therefore affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradshaw v. State
1919 OK CR 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1917 OK CR 147, 166 P. 445, 13 Okla. Crim. 662, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.