Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

New York Supreme Court

Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

13 N.Y.S. 306, 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 763, 59 Hun 617, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1080

New York Supreme Court·Decided February 4, 1891·Published

Opinion

Landon, J.

The court of appeals, reviewing this case as it appeared upon a former trial, held that it was a question for the jury whether the transaction was a bailment or a sale. 119 N. Y. 334, 23 N. E. Rep. 736. The case now presents the same facts which the court of appeals commented upon, some as indicating a bailment, others as indicating a sale. There are a few additional facts, but some tend to support the one conclusion, and others the other. We discover no error in the rulings of the trial court to the prejudice of the defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landon, J.

The court of appeals, reviewing this case as it appeared upon a former trial, held that it was a question for the jury whether the transaction was a bailment or a sale. 119 N. Y. 334, 23 N. E. Rep. 736. The case now presents the same facts which the court of appeals commented upon, some as indicating a bailment, others as indicating a sale. There are a few additional facts, but some tend to support the one conclusion, and others the other. We discover no error in the rulings of the trial court to the prejudice of the defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co., 13 N.Y.S. 306, 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 763, 59 Hun 617, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1080 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

13 N.Y.S. 306 (Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related