Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
This text of 13 N.Y.S. 306 (Crosby v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court of appeals, reviewing this case as it appeared upon a former trial, held that it was a question for the jury whether the transaction was a bailment or a sale. 119 N. Y. 334, 23 N. E. Rep. 736. The case now presents the same facts which the court of appeals commented upon, some as indicating a bailment, others as indicating a sale. There are a few additional facts, but some tend to support the one conclusion, and others the other. We discover no error in the rulings of the trial court to the prejudice of the defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.Y.S. 306, 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 763, 59 Hun 617, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-president-of-delaware-hudson-canal-co-nysupct-1891.