Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Crosby v. Downs

Crosby v. Downs

913 So. 2d 579, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2044, 2005 WL 2508755
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2005
DocketNo. SC04-1153
StatusPublished

This text of 913 So. 2d 579 (Crosby v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crosby v. Downs, 913 So. 2d 579, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2044, 2005 WL 2508755 (Fla. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), based on express and direct conflict with a decision of another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Clarence W. Downs has been released from custody and said release went unchallenged by the Florida Department of Corrections. The issues in the case are now moot as they apply to Downs. We exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause as moot. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C j., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Downs v. Crosby
874 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 So. 2d 579, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2044, 2005 WL 2508755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-downs-fla-2005.