Crosby v. Downs

913 So. 2d 579, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2044, 2005 WL 2508755
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 12, 2005·No. No. SC04-1153·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), based on express and direct conflict with a decision of another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Clarence W. Downs has been released from custody and said release went unchallenged by the Florida Department of Corrections. The issues in the case are now moot as they apply to Downs. We exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause as moot. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C j., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosby v. Downs, 913 So. 2d 579, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2044, 2005 WL 2508755 (Fla. 2005).

913 So. 2d 579 (Crosby v. Downs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downs v. Crosby
874 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)