Crosby v. Cushinberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7919

MICHAEL FIZTROY CROSBY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CAPTAIN CUSHINBERRY; CAPTAIN ROBINSON; JUAN CARRILLO, Doctor,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: June 28, 2010 Decided: July 14, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Fiztroy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Charles Everett James, Jr., Brendan David O’Toole, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Fiztroy Crosby appeals the district court’s

order granting summary judgment for Defendants in this 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) inmate civil rights action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v.

Cushinberry, No. 2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED