Crosby v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Crosby v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 1147, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2053

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided September 28, 1926·No. Docket No. 3764.·Published

Opinion

[1149] OPINION.

Marquette:

The Commissioner erred in adding to the taxpayer’s income, as reported by him for the year 1918, the amount of $3,000 representing salary paid him by the Independence Bureau, and the amount of the tax paid at the source on interest from tax-free covenant bonds. In all other respects the determination of the Commissioner is approved.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Bule 50.

Phillips and Smith dissent in so far as the decision includes the cost to the tenant of installing a furnace as income to the landlord.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1149] OPINION.

Marquette:

The Commissioner erred in adding to the taxpayer’s income, as reported by him for the year 1918, the amount of $3,000 representing salary paid him by the Independence Bureau, and the amount of the tax paid at the source on interest from tax-free covenant bonds. In all other respects the determination of the Commissioner is approved.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Bule 50.

Phillips and Smith dissent in so far as the decision includes the cost to the tenant of installing a furnace as income to the landlord.

Crosby v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 1147, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2053 (bta 1926).

Pincite

4 B.T.A. 1147 (Crosby v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related