Crosby v. City of East Orange
103 A. 859, 92 N.J.L. 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 248
This text of 103 A. 859 (Crosby v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crosby v. City of East Orange, 103 A. 859, 92 N.J.L. 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1918).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Payne v. Bevel
1923 OK 1092 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 A. 859, 92 N.J.L. 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1918.