Crosby v. City of East Orange

103 A. 859, 92 N.J.L. 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 248

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 3, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosby v. City of East Orange, 103 A. 859, 92 N.J.L. 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1918).

Pincite

103 A. 859 (Crosby v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.