Crosby v. Brantly

20 Ala. 287
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

The action below was on an open account, for a sum less than twenty dollars, and was brought to the Circuit Court by appeal. The judgment was by default, and the record does not show that any proof was made to the court of the correctness of the demand. This was an error, as this court has expressly decided, in Kenum v. Henderson, 6 Ala. 132, and Witherington v. Brantly, 18 ib. 197.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosby v. Brantly, 20 Ala. 287 (Ala. 1852).

20 Ala. 287 (Crosby v. Brantly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
66 So. 2d 103 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)