Crosby v. Brantly
This text of 20 Ala. 287 (Crosby v. Brantly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action below was on an open account, for a sum less than twenty dollars, and was brought to the Circuit Court by appeal. The judgment was by default, and the record does not show that any proof was made to the court of the correctness of the demand. This was an error, as this court has expressly decided, in Kenum v. Henderson, 6 Ala. 132, and Witherington v. Brantly, 18 ib. 197.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ala. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-brantly-ala-1852.