Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Crosby v. Bolden

Crosby v. Bolden

867 So. 2d 373, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 75, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 186, 2004 WL 252040
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 2004
DocketNo. SC03-137
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 373 (Crosby v. Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crosby v. Bolden, 867 So. 2d 373, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 75, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 186, 2004 WL 252040 (Fla. 2004).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Bolden v. Moore, 865 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying a question to be of great public importance. Upon reflection and further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNeil v. Canty
12 So. 3d 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Lewis v. Crosby
878 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 373, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 75, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 186, 2004 WL 252040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-bolden-fla-2004.