Crosby v. Berger
4 Edw. Ch. 210
This text of 4 Edw. Ch. 210 (Crosby v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crosby v. Berger, 4 Edw. Ch. 210 (N.Y. 1843).
Opinion
The Vice-Chancellor overruled the demurrer, principally on the ground that the defendants had no right to take the objection that the attorney general was not a necessary or proper party; and especially as these defendants could not be injured even if he were improperly made a party defendant.
Mr. R. Lockwood, in support of the demurrer.
Mr. J. L. Mason and Mr. B. F. Butler, contra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wheeler v. Town of St. Johnsbury
87 A. 349 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1913)
Cohn-Baer-Myers & Aronson Co. v. Realty Transfer Co.
117 A.D. 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Edw. Ch. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-berger-nychanct-1843.